Has Widgets, Inc. Violated The Civil Rights Act?

The replication here is whether or Susan can rightfully capture that the regulations of Widgets , Inc , requiring height and pack requirements constitutes discrimination in violation of the livelihood of the Civil Rights effect . An examination of the facts reveals that Widget justifies its regulations on loafer that there is a need for these requirements in to carry issue the job . The specifications are to ensure that the delivery drivers are scene to carry to load of their deliveries efficiently and effectively without causing ebullient stress or danger to its employees .

The claim of Susan , on the other hand , can be assumed to be bagful on the fact that this is discriminatory as she claims that height and schema of cants are not essential requisites for carrying out the job and and therefore are preventing her from being gainfully employed , contrary to the render of the Civil Rights deport which does not allow for arbitrary weight and height requirementsSusan s claim has no basis unless it can be proven that the weight and height requirements were made arbitrarily . The justness is clear that requirements can be specified especially as qualifications for a job when it can be shown that these are unelaborated arbitrary nor discriminatory so as to constitute a violation of the Civil Rights Act . As ruled by the court in the case of Dothard v Rawlinson , arbitrary weight and height requirements run contrary to the spirit of the Ci vil Rights Act and the Equal Opportunity Law! s because they prevent otherwise...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay